CONTACTS - FOUNDATION -
HOME - A-Z INDEX
2015 - The Green Shipping program aimed to revolutionize the way coastal shipping operates, converting fleets to run partly or entirely on batteries,
liquefied natural gas (LNG) or other green fuels.
The concept above is battery operated.
Norway launched an award-winning joint programme between government and industry to create the world’s most environmentally-friendly fleet of coastal vessels. The first five pilot projects have a particular focus on environmentally-friendly fuels and energy efficient design.
Programme director (DNV GL) Narve Mjøs is quoted as saying:
“When we launched the Green Coastal Shipping Programme, we said we wanted to make Norway a world showcase for green coastal shipping. With these five pioneering pilot projects we are well on our way.”
DNV GL provide classification, technical assurance, software and independent expert advisory services to the maritime, oil & gas and energy industries. They also provide certification services to customers across a wide range of industries.
ships and boats are vessels that use renewable energy to power
themselves through the water, no matter what the type of ship.
Before the advent of coal
powered steam ships, sailing (tall ships) were all green and
non polluting in terms of climate
change. Reciprocating piston steam engines led to steam turbines with the famous
Turbinia from Parsons.
came diesel engines and worst of all nuclear powered submarines
carriers, none of which is ultimately sustainable for a
truly circular economy. The
problem being that at the moment our economies are reliant on
cheap ocean transport for international trade - something that
we take for granted with globalization; ignoring the harm that
the burning of fossil fuels is causing. That said, MARPOL
marine anti-pollution legislation is beginning to bite with LNG
powered ships kicking off a move to cleaner burning internal
combustion engined leviathans. The fact is that cargo
ships are still the most efficient way of moving goods around
the world and we cannot do without them - so must work toward
vessels that are totally clean running, while allowing fleet
operators to reap the rewards of current investments so that
forward profits may be invested in zero carbon transport.
- Stephane Chopard & Raphaelle Javet (communications) and Raphael
Domjan (pilot) on a visit to the SeaVax solar powered
project in the UK in August 2017. Raphael's PlanetSolar
project set the benchmark when it comes to zero carbon
power is unthinkable and should be banned internationally. It
is impossible to eliminate the risks from nuclear waste, it is
just dumping future problems in our own back yard - and for
what? So that world powers can strut around and threaten or
impress other nations with the size of their weapons. It is
truly Freudian in an age of cyber attacks, robotics
and drones and a complete waste of taxpayers money where there
are other more pressing world issues to resolve, such as food
should exchange military growth (expenditure) for Blue Green
Growth, change out military careers for jobs in peaceful,
sustainable sectors. Obviously, in the process keeping pace
with technology and using that technology to help us maintain
world peace. World peace can only be sustained with stability
in terms of energy, food and climate
security. Apart from the suffering caused by war, it is more
economical to invest in security for peace than to retain an
arsenal of weapons to protect diminishing supplies.
AWARDS 2015 - Initiated by DNV GL, the Green Coastal Programme was kicked off at DNV GL’s headquarters in 2015 when the Norwegian Minister of Trade and Industry, Monica Mæland, and the State Secretary for the Ministry of Climate and Environment, Lars Andreas Lunde, signed a declaration of cooperation with key players in the Norwegian coastal shipping industry. The programme declaration aims to ensure that Norway has the world's most environmentally friendly fleet of coastal vessels, realized by the industry and government working together in a long-term partnership program.
Richard Meade, editor of Lloyd’s List, is quoted as saying: “They stood out as an impressively ambitious example of environmental aspiration coupled with a pragmatic understanding of business and politics. The prospect of a long-term public-private partnership programme that offers tangible targets struck our panel as a potential game-changer worthy of public support.”
of the first true (blue-water) green ships, was the Planet
Solar that in 2012 set a world first record for a solar
Other landmark vessels include the Solarsailer, and now there
is a move to wind and
solar assisted cargo ships, some of
which are fitted with solar panels.
it is hoped that internal combustion power can be replaced
altogether with wind and solar powered ships like the SeaVax
concepts that are under development (subject to funding). This
will only happen with the support of the people and the
political will to change.
POWERED VESSEL - This vessel is designed to operate in fleets
to target ocean waste before it settles on the ocean floor
where nobody can recover it. There is nothing like it in
existence today, though other ideas for trapping plastic waste
are being developed, such as that of Boyan
Slat and the Seabin.
LINK 5 SEPTEMBER 2017, FULL ELECTRIC AUTONOMOUS FERRY
CONCEPT FROM KONGSBERG
KONGSBERG said it has signed a Research & Innovation (R&I) contract with technology acceleration organization PILOT-E for the development of zero emission, full-electric, autonomous ferry concepts. The overall vision for the PILOT-E Autonomous Ferry concept is to develop a state-of-the-art ferry as an integrated, zero emission aspect of a total national transportation plan.
The PILOT-E program, a collaboration between the Norwegian Research Council,
Innovasjon Norge and Enova, is designed to accelerate time to market for cutting-edge technology concepts, while at the same time ensuring that the solutions produced are viable and sustainable. Its goal is to ensure that the benefits of advanced projects result in actual deliveries to the market.
For KONGSBERG, the R&I contract provides partial funding for developing new autonomous functionality such as Auto Docking and Auto Sailing, giving the Norwegian maritime technology specialist the momentum to continue its pioneering development of autonomous functionality for commercial vessels.
KONGSBERG said it has already established a number of key industry partnerships on projects that will result in new connected, autonomous and environmentally friendly ships within the next two years, including the YARA Birkeland container feeder and the Hrönn offshore service vessel.
To fulfill the PILOT-E mission, KONGSBERG is heading a consortium with
Grenland Energy on marine battery technology,
Fjellstrand shipyard on vessel design,
Grønn Kontakt on the charging of electric cars both quay-side and on board, and NTNU as a research partner within autonomy and energy management. The partners in the PILOT-E project have been chosen due to their complementary technology and a shared ambition of developing robust solutions for the future.
An-Magritt Tinlund Ryste, Project Manager, Kongsberg Maritime,
is quoted as saying: “The stakes are high and the autonomy vision is materializing as we speak. The PILOT-E Autonomous Ferry project introduces a new mindset encouraging us to look beyond the traditional organizational setup. To meet the ambitious time-to-market expectations, we must really adopt the true meaning of collaboration and step-up the work across technological
areas within KONGSBERG and between partners, to harvest the best from each area of expertise.”
FERRY - Kongsberg Gruppen (KONGSBERG) is an international technology group that delivers advanced and reliable solutions improving safety, security and performance in complex operations and under extreme conditions. KONGSBERG works
with customers in the global defence, maritime, oil and gas, fisheries and aerospace sectors.
The above picture is of a new ferry concept with autonomous functionality in development including Auto Docking and Auto Sailing / Auto Crossing.
IN CHANGING CLIMATES (SCC) CONSORTIUM FOR SUSTAINABLE RESEARCH
The consortium in the
SCC project seeks to understand the scope for greater energy efficiency of the supply side, understand the demand side drivers and understanding the supply and demand interactions in shipping.
To research these themes the consortium utilises its access to ‘big data’ and modelling to understand real performance trends and drivers, validate assumptions, computational simulations and models and verify whole systems results. The overall aims of the SCC project are to achieve the following:
Connect, for the first time, the latest climate change impact and adaptation analysis with knowledge and models of the shipping industry to explore its vulnerability to changing climates.
* Develop greater understanding of the role of shipping in underpinning future food and fuel security in a carbon and climate constrained world.
* Consolidate research taking place across a number of research projects (engineering, energy systems and shipping), both in the UK and elsewhere
* Further develop the modelling capacity developed under RCUK Energy’s 2009 Low Carbon Shipping project to answer the increasing number of new questions that are emerging both since 2009 and as a result of research carried out in the last 3 years.
* Achieve, through improved data and modelling techniques, an unprecedented level of credibility for models and analysis of the shipping system to enable shipping industry stakeholders and policy makers to manage uncertainty, and take the long term view.
* Integrate knowledge about public and private law to identify policy options at all levels of governance and the options for private standard setting bodies (such as classification societies) to achieve significant GHG savings in a manner which is consistent with other concerns.
* Engage in the UK and EU debate around control of its shipping GHG emissions, and to provide the tools to assess how governments and stakeholders can most effectively influence the pathway of a global industry, while taking into account legal and other constraints.
Shipping in Changing Climates is a recently initiated research project funded by the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (£3.5m funded for 3.5 years), Lloyds Register,
Royce, Shell, BMT and MSI . The SCC project seeks to understand the scope for greater energy efficiency of the supply side, understand the demand side drivers and understanding the supply and demand interactions in shipping. The multi-university, multi-disciplinary systems research project will use ‘big data’ sources such as the Satellite AIS data, ship level smart data, to which the consortium has unparalleled access aswell as combining quantitative with qualitative research methods in which the consortium has a solid background.
CROSS CUTTING THEMES
The whole systems approach is crucial in order
to meet the objectives and address our perceptions of the knowledge deficits exposed by the state of the art and to meet the project’s aims. In recognition of the challenge of managing and delivering outcomes in a multi-university, multi-disciplinary systems research, the SCC project is organised as a three themed research structure:
Theme 1: Understanding the scope for greater energy efficiency on the transport’s supply side – the ship as a system, (UCL Mechanical engineering, Strathclyde, Newcastle)
Objective: The interconnection of ship design techniques and performance analysis with environmental conditions and operational strategy validated using real-world operator data to propose improvements to existing vessels and step-change solutions for future shipping. The theme will develop tools to simulate the ship as a system taking full account of interactions between the
hydrodynamics of the hull, propulsor, main machinery and auxiliary systems in a range of realistic conditions. The tools will be used to assess the impact of modifications to existing ships and to explore step-change solutions, including both synergies and unintended negative consequences.
Theme 2: Understanding demand side drivers and trends – trade and transport demand, (UCL Energy, Manchester,
Objective: To investigate plausible future developments of international trade and resource availability to produce a suite of global scenarios for shipping demand and its drivers. To assess a) the direct impacts of
climate change and mitigation policies on the shipping system (including polices aimed specifically at ships and ports, or climate impacts on shipping infrastructure) and b) the equally important indirect impacts, such as the effect of energy system decarbonisation on the trade of fossil fuels, or climate impacts on key trading commodities.
Theme 3: Understanding supply/demand interactions – transition and evolution of the shipping system, (UCL-Energy, UCL Mechanical engineering, UCL Laws, Strathclyde Newcastle, Manchester)
Objective: Development of tools and their deployment in combination with the project’s work on supply side
energy efficiency and demand side drivers for the analysis of the different pathways for the shipping industry and how transitions can be accelerated.
Dr Tristan Smith
Telephone: +44 203 108 5984
Dr Nishatabbas Rehmatulla
Telephone: +44 7540051942
Telephone: +44 203 108 5965
UCL Energy Institute
14 Upper Woburn Place
REGISTER - Lloyd’s Register (LR) and Shipping in Changing Climates released Low Carbon Pathways 2050 – a new study that details a number of potential pathways for the shipping industry’s transition to a low carbon future. The report underlines the need for shipping to start its decarbonisation imminently – as stringency increases over time, increasingly high-cost mitigation steps are required. The later we leave decarbonisation, the more rapid and potentially disruptive it will be for shipping.
Low Carbon Shipping – A Systems Approach, was a research project that started in January 2010 and ended in June 2013 funded by the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (£1.7m) and a number of industry partners. In addition to the research that was undertaken at the five universities including University College London, Newcastle University, University of Strathclyde, University of Hull and
Plymouth, the project was supported by substantial in-house research and data from the consortium members from industry, NGO and government departments, including Shell, Maersk, Rolls Royce, BMT and Lloyds Register.
- INTERNATIONAL WEEKLY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE 17 FEB 2016
It is time to crack down on the emissions and destructive development caused by vast container vessels that pollute the air and seas, write
Zhu, Shun Chen
& Daniel Sperling.
On 26 April 1956, US entrepreneur Malcom McLean watched a converted
oil tanker leave Port Newark in New Jersey carrying 58 of his inventions: the modular shipping container. By 2015, the largest container ship in the world, with a deck the area of 3.5
soccer fields, could carry about 20,000 of the units.
Ever-bigger container ships carry 90% of global consumer goods such as clothes and
cargo). The seaborne container trade has grown from 100 million tonnes in 1980 to about 1.6 billion tonnes in 2014. Standardized 20-foot (6-metre) containers are moved using automated systems that connect seaports, airports and train stations2. Bigger ships carry more containers, ideally consuming less
oil and releasing fewer pollutants for each unit of goods carried.
Nonetheless, the human and environmental costs of shipping are vast. Low-grade marine
fuel oil contains 3,500 times more sulfur than road diesel. Large ships pollute the air in hub ports, accounting for one-third to half of airborne pollutants in
example. Particulates emitted from ships cause 60,000 cardiopulmonary and
lung-cancer deaths each year worldwide4. Expanding harbours to take vast ships destroys coastal ecosystems. And scrapping fleets of obsolete smaller ships pollutes seas and soils, and damages workers' health, especially in the developing world5.
The industry is at a crossroads. The expected profits from larger ships are being undermined by excess capacity, slowing trade and plunging transport prices. In 2015, container freight rates for the world's busiest shipping route — between Asia and northern Europe — dropped by nearly 60% in three weeks. A dozen shipping companies went bankrupt, including Denmark's Copenship and China's Nantsing. Even the giant container-conveying Danish conglomerate Maersk announced that it would lay off 4,000 employees by 2017 and delayed or cancelled orders to build mega-ships.
Companies face a dilemma. If they buck the trend of scaling up, they risk being less competitive. Yet running mega-ships only part full wipes out the benefits of economies of scale. Ships use more fuel per container when half-loaded than for a full cargo.
The future is green shipping: efficient marine transport with minimal health and ecological damage6. Cleaner practices — especially on ship scrapping, emission control and port management — are needed. Achieving this will require heroic efforts by the industry and its engineers in collaboration with regulators, port authorities and communities. Environmental impacts should be considered in determining optimal routes and modes for delivery of goods.
Shipping is the most energy-efficient way to move large volumes of cargo. Yet ships emit nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfur oxides (SOx), carbon dioxide and particulate matter (PM) into the atmosphere. Worldwide, from 2007 to 2012, shipping accounted7 for 15% of annual NOx emissions from anthropogenic sources, 13% of SOx and 3% of CO2. In Europe in 2013, ships contributed 18% of NOx emissions, 18% of SOx and 11% of particles less than 2.5 micrometres in size (PM2.5). For road transport, the figures were 33%, 0% and 12%, respectively. Aviation, by contrast, accounted for only 6%, 1% and 1%, respectively, and rail just 1%, 0% and 0%.
Shipping policies must be applied worldwide to be effective. Shipping and aviation emissions are not addressed by global climate-change agreements, including the deal made in Paris last December. The International Maritime Organization (IMO), which regulates international shipping, is engaging — slowly. Releases into the oceans of oils, noxious liquids, harmful substances, sewage and garbage have been restricted since the 1980s by the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL), following a spate of oil-tanker accidents. Air-pollution limits for shipping were adopted in 1997 but came into force only in 2005.
Energy efficiency is the IMO's present focus. Starting in 2013, its Energy Efficiency Design Index and Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plan aim to lower
CO2 emissions from shipping through tighter technical requirements on engines and equipment, maintenance regimes and voyage plans. No absolute emissions-reduction targets were set. Unfortunately, long-term expansion in global trade and growing ship numbers mean that even if these measures are fully implemented, total shipping emissions are projected to quadruple from 1990 to
The IMO has set up four 'emission-control areas' — the Baltic
Sea, the North Sea, the US Caribbean and the coastal waters of
Canada and the
United States — where ships are required to minimize emissions mainly of SOx and NOx. These regions exclude the world's ten largest container ports, such as the Chinese ports of Shanghai, Shenzhen, Hong Kong and the South Korean port of Busan, which are all in Asia (see 'The dirty ten'). We estimate that these ten sites alone contribute 20% of port emissions worldwide.
A few developed countries, including the United States, the United Kingdom and Norway, limit the sulfur content of marine fuel in their national waters to within 1,000 parts per million (p.p.m.). Most developing countries, including India and China, permit dirtier fuels with 35,000 p.p.m. of sulfur. The European Union fuel standard for cars is 10 p.p.m.
Ship scrapping is heavily polluting. Asbestos, heavy metals and oils are toxic. Workers are exposed to hazardous fumes. The EU has laws requiring that ships registered in Europe be broken up only in licensed yards that meet strict guidelines. But it is easy to change a ship's registration and demolish it in a country with a more lax approach to labour and environmental protection.
India, Bangladesh, and Pakistan are popular for ship
scrapping. In Bangladesh for example, 40,000 mangroves — trees that stabilize many tropical coasts and are habitats and breeding grounds for many species — were chopped down in 2009 alone to accommodate shipbreaking yards. The pollution from scrapping there has caused an estimated 21
fish and crustacean species to become extinct. And reportedly, each week one worker dies and seven are injured in the scrap yards of
Congestion adds to pollution and disruption. Large volumes of cargo overwhelm ports, surrounding roads and waterways. Hasty expansion or construction of berths and canals to take more large ships can be environmentally disastrous. Where the water in existing harbours is too shallow, port authorities may reclaim land from the sea or build artificial islands in deeper waters.
Coastal changes destroy ecosystems. Over the past three decades, about 75% of mangroves have disappeared from Shenzhen, following port expansion and land reclamation. Plans for the Porto Sul port in Brazil — slated to open in 2019 — identified 36 potential environmental impacts, including driving away dolphins and whales and killing seabed fauna.
Traditional shipping routes cannot keep up. The Panama Canal, which connects the
Atlantic oceans, can currently handle vessels carrying only up to about 5,000 standard containers. A project to expand it to accept ships with 13,000 containers (the 'New Panamax' class) should be completed by May. But the largest mega-ships, such as Maersk's E-class and Triple E-class (with capacities between 14,000 and 18,000 containers), will still be unable to cross (see 'Supersize ships'). In the meantime, heavy traffic at
navigation and constant maintenance have led to a ten-day delay in voyage times.
To take advantage of the business opportunity, construction is scheduled to start this year on a 280-kilometre-long canal through Nicaragua. This
US$50-billion project, funded by a billionaire-owned Hong Kong company, could destroy almost 400,000 hectares of tropical forests and wetlands, home to threatened and endangered wildlife and indigenous
Public concern about the pollution and health impacts of shipping remains muted because the industry is a backbone of the global economy, and its activities happen far from where most people live and often beyond the jurisdiction of local regulators. We cannot rely only on new ship designs and engine innovation to minimize the ecological footprint of shipping: today's ships might be in use for another 20 years or more. Several issues must be addressed together to make the industry greener.
Implementing the following recommendations could save thousands of lives each year, ensure cleaner coastal
air and reduce ecological damage from shipping.
Clean up ship scrapping. The IMO adopted the Hong Kong International Convention for the Safe and Environmentally Sound Recycling of Ships in 2009, but only Norway, Congo and
France have acceded as of February 2016. The IMO's priority should be to ensure that the principal scrappers — India, Bangladesh and
Pakistan — adhere to these guidelines. The first step is to set up local offices in these countries to collect and analyse monitoring data independently and to propose improvements to local governments. International loan or aid programmes to these countries, sponsored by the World Bank or the Asian Development Bank, for example, should demand clean ship-scrapping practices as an incentive. To discourage transfer of scrapping elsewhere, a watch list of poorly performing countries needs to be updated by IMO regularly until an international convention enters into force.
Control emissions. Stricter IMO emissions regulations are needed, including a cleaner worldwide standard for sulfur released by combustion of
fuel. A 97% cut in SOx can be achieved by reducing the sulfur content from 35,000 p.p.m. to 1,000 p.p.m. fuel oil. Today's low oil price provides a great opportunity for this transition to happen. The current cost of 1,000-p.p.m.-grade fuel
oil (around US$300 per tonne in Singapore, for example) is less than half of that of the cheapest dirty fuel four years ago.
Marine fuel is a sideline for oil refineries — only 2–4% of the total fuel market. Stricter emissions standards will stimulate demand for high-quality fuel. Incentive programmes (tax rebate and subsidies for producers) will be needed to ensure a reasonable profit margin to recover the initial high investment in developing countries, where there is little current capacity. Government interventions will be needed in countries with state-run oil companies, such as in
An alternative is to install scrubbers for exhaust-gas cleaning on ships. Scrubber units blend the exhaust gas with water or caustic soda to remove up to 99% of SOx and 98% of particulate matter from high-sulfur fuel. At the moment, scrubbers are expensive, costing $2
million for one ship. But
China, for instance, could equip its entire container fleet in one year by funding a 50% subsidy for scrubbers. The total cost? Just 0.5% of the $150
billion per year it has spent since 2013 to fight pollution. Shipping companies could recoup the other 50% in one year from fuel savings. With a stricter emissions standard, the demand for scrubbers would go up, and the costs down, as production scales.
Improve port management. Port authorities should review the environmental impact of their previous construction and disclose information on their future development plans to demonstrate responsible management of public assets. They should coordinate with transport-planning bureaus to seek the most economical and environmentally friendly strategy to dispatch goods; the optimal capacities of its terminals; and how to assist ships to load and unload quickly. Making port-business statistics and the results of environmental-impact studies accessible will allow the research community to be involved in the decision-making process. Environmental non-governmental organizations should campaign to increase public awareness of port development.
After decades of loose oversight, it is time for shipping to get a whole lot greener.
could not agree more.
Zheng Wan is associate professor at the College of Transport and Communications, Shanghai Maritime
University, Shanghai, China.
Mo Zhu is assistant professor at the College of Transport and Communications, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai, China.
Shun Chen is associate professor at the College of Transport and Communications, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai, China.
Daniel Sperling is distinguished professor of civil engineering and environmental science and policy, and founding director of the Institute of Transportation Studies, at the University of
BLUE GROWTH AREAS
Ocean Regeneration - cleaning our oceans to preserve the
resource and cleanse the toxic food chain
Aquaculture - now generates around 50% of world produce,
to wild fish feed
Ocean Energy - offshore wind and wave energy for clean
Biotechnology - Identifying, harvesting and producing
Coastal Tourism - To engage the public in ocean matters
and reduce air travel
Green Ships - Cargo and cruise ships that are cleaner,
preferably zero carbon
LIFE - This humpback whale is one example of a magnificent
animal that is at the mercy of human
activity. Humans are for the most part unaware of the harm their fast-lane
lifestyles are causing. We aim to change that by doing all we
can to promote ocean
website is provided on a free basis as a public information
service. Copyright © Cleaner
Oceans Foundation Ltd (COFL) (Company No: 4674774)
September 2017. Solar
Studios, BN271RF, United Kingdom.
is a charity without share capital.